↓ Skip to main content

Behavioral Intervention Improves Treatment Outcomes Among HIV-Infected Individuals Who Have Delayed, Declined, or Discontinued Antiretroviral Therapy: A Randomized Controlled Trial of a Novel…

Overview of attention for article published in AIDS and Behavior, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
142 Mendeley
Title
Behavioral Intervention Improves Treatment Outcomes Among HIV-Infected Individuals Who Have Delayed, Declined, or Discontinued Antiretroviral Therapy: A Randomized Controlled Trial of a Novel Intervention
Published in
AIDS and Behavior, April 2015
DOI 10.1007/s10461-015-1054-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marya Gwadz, Charles M. Cleland, Elizabeth Applegate, Mindy Belkin, Monica Gandhi, Nadim Salomon, Angela Banfield, Noelle Leonard, Marion Riedel, Hannah Wolfe, Isaiah Pickens, Kelly Bolger, DeShannon Bowens, David Perlman, Donna Mildvan, The Heart to Heart Collaborative Research Team

Abstract

Nationally up to 60 % of persons living with HIV are neither taking antiretroviral therapy (ART) nor well engaged in HIV care, mainly racial/ethnic minorities. This study examined a new culturally targeted multi-component intervention to address emotional, attitudinal, and social/structural barriers to ART initiation and HIV care. Participants (N = 95) were African American/Black and Latino adults with CD4 < 500 cells/mm(3) not taking ART, randomized 1:1 to intervention or control arms, the latter receiving treatment as usual. Primary endpoints were adherence, evaluated via ART concentrations in hair samples, and HIV viral load suppression. The intervention was feasible and acceptable. Eight months post-baseline, intervention participants tended to be more likely to evidence "good" (that is, 7 days/week) adherence (60 vs. 26.7 %; p = 0.087; OR = 3.95), and had lower viral load levels than controls (t(22) = 2.29, p = 0.032; OR = 5.20), both large effect sizes. This highly promising intervention merits further study.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 142 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Unknown 140 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 20 14%
Student > Master 19 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 12%
Student > Bachelor 15 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 7%
Other 26 18%
Unknown 35 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 33 23%
Psychology 18 13%
Social Sciences 16 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 11%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 4%
Other 14 10%
Unknown 40 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 April 2015.
All research outputs
#1,704,899
of 23,849,058 outputs
Outputs from AIDS and Behavior
#212
of 3,566 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,873
of 266,113 outputs
Outputs of similar age from AIDS and Behavior
#3
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,849,058 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,566 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 266,113 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.