↓ Skip to main content

A multilevel investigation of inequalities in clinical and psychosocial outcomes for women after breast cancer

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Cancer, September 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
63 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A multilevel investigation of inequalities in clinical and psychosocial outcomes for women after breast cancer
Published in
BMC Cancer, September 2011
DOI 10.1186/1471-2407-11-415
Pubmed ID
Authors

Philippa H Youl, Peter D Baade, Joanne F Aitken, Suzanne K Chambers, Gavin Turrell, Christopher Pyke, Jeffrey Dunn

Abstract

In Australia, breast cancer is the most common cancer affecting Australian women. Inequalities in clinical and psychosocial outcomes have existed for some time, affecting particularly women from rural areas and from areas of disadvantage. We have a limited understanding of how individual and area-level factors are related to each other, and their associations with survival and other clinical and psychosocial outcomes.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 63 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 13%
Researcher 7 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 10%
Student > Bachelor 6 10%
Other 4 6%
Other 14 22%
Unknown 18 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 15 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 13%
Social Sciences 5 8%
Psychology 5 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Other 9 14%
Unknown 19 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 September 2011.
All research outputs
#17,648,479
of 22,653,392 outputs
Outputs from BMC Cancer
#4,955
of 8,237 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#107,747
of 131,733 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Cancer
#66
of 101 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,653,392 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,237 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 131,733 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 101 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.