↓ Skip to main content

Identification of subsets of actionable genetic alterations in KRAS-mutant lung cancers using association rule mining

Overview of attention for article published in Cellular Oncology, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
Title
Identification of subsets of actionable genetic alterations in KRAS-mutant lung cancers using association rule mining
Published in
Cellular Oncology, April 2018
DOI 10.1007/s13402-018-0377-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Junior Tayou

Abstract

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related death in both men and women. KRAS mutations occur in ~ 25% of patients with lung cancer, and the presence of these mutations is associated with a poor prognosis. Unfortunately, efforts to directly target KRAS or its associated downstream MAPK or PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathways have seen little or no benefits. Here, I hypothesize that KRAS-mutant tumors do not respond to KRAS pathway therapies due to the co-occurrence of other activated cell survival pathways and/or mechanisms. To identify other potentially activated cell survival pathways in KRAS-mutant tumors, I performed association rule mining on somatic mutations in 725 metastatic lung cancer patient samples. I identified 67 additional genes that were mutated in at least 10% of the samples with KRAS mutations. This gene list was enriched with genes involved in the MAPK, AKT and STAT3 pathways, as well as in cell-cell adhesion, DNA repair, chromatin remodeling and the Wnt/β-catenin pathway. I also identified 160 overlapping subsets of three or more genes that code for oncogenic or tumor suppressive proteins that were mutated in at least 10% of the KRAS-mutant tumors. I identified several genes that are co-mutated in primary KRAS-mutant lung cancer samples. I also identified subpopulations of KRAS-mutant lung cancers based on sets of genes that were co-mutated. Pre-clinical models that capture these subsets of KRAS-mutant tumors may enhance our understanding of lung cancer development and, in addition, facilitate the design of personalized treatment strategies for lung cancer patients carrying KRAS mutations.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 17 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 18%
Student > Bachelor 3 18%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 6%
Professor 1 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 8 47%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 24%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 12%
Computer Science 2 12%
Environmental Science 1 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 7 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 December 2020.
All research outputs
#15,906,098
of 25,622,179 outputs
Outputs from Cellular Oncology
#147
of 470 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#191,304
of 341,206 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cellular Oncology
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,622,179 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 470 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,206 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them