↓ Skip to main content

Protein Evolution is Potentially Governed by Protein Stability: Directed Evolution of an Esterase from the Hyperthermophilic Archaeon Sulfolobus tokodaii

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Molecular Evolution, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
30 Mendeley
Title
Protein Evolution is Potentially Governed by Protein Stability: Directed Evolution of an Esterase from the Hyperthermophilic Archaeon Sulfolobus tokodaii
Published in
Journal of Molecular Evolution, April 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00239-018-9843-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ryo Kurahashi, Satoshi Sano, Kazufumi Takano

Abstract

The study of evolution is important to understand biological phenomena. During evolutionary processes, genetic changes confer amino acid substitutions in proteins, resulting in new or improved functions. Unfortunately, most mutations destabilize proteins. Thus, protein stability is a significant factor in evolution; however, its role remains unclear. Here, we simply and directly explored the association between protein activity and stability in random mutant libraries to elucidate the role of protein stability in evolutionary processes. In the first random mutation of an esterase from Sulfolobus tokodaii, approximately 20% of the variants displayed higher activity than wild-type protein (i.e., 20% evolvability). During evolutionary processes, the evolvability depended on the stability of template proteins, indicating that protein evolution is potentially governed by protein stability. Furthermore, decreased activity could be recovered during evolution by maintaining the stability of variants. The results suggest that protein sequence space for its evolution is able to expand during nearly neutral evolution where mutations are slightly deleterious for activity but rarely fatal for stability. Molecular evolution is a crucial phenomenon that has continued since the birth of life on earth, and mechanism underlying it is simple; therefore, this could be demonstrated by our simple experiments. These findings also can be applied to protein engineering.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 30 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 17%
Student > Bachelor 3 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 7%
Professor 2 7%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 10 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 33%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 17%
Computer Science 1 3%
Chemistry 1 3%
Unknown 13 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 April 2018.
All research outputs
#20,481,952
of 23,043,346 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Molecular Evolution
#1,388
of 1,451 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#288,038
of 326,937 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Molecular Evolution
#10
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,043,346 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,451 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,937 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.