↓ Skip to main content

Analysis of swine fecal microbiota at various growth stages

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Microbiology, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
68 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
91 Mendeley
Title
Analysis of swine fecal microbiota at various growth stages
Published in
Archives of Microbiology, April 2015
DOI 10.1007/s00203-015-1108-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jungman Kim, Son G. Nguyen, Robin B. Guevarra, Iljoo Lee, Tatsuya Unno

Abstract

Recent obesity studies in humans and rodents have suggested that host weight gain is significantly associated with energy harvesting efficiency which is regulated by gut microbiota. Antibiotic growth promoters have been banned as feed additives in many countries. In this study, we aimed to provide knowledge of swine fecal microbiota by analyzing bacterial 16S rRNA gene sequences. Our results showed that swine fecal bacterial composition varied at each growth stage. Bacteroidetes decreased as the swine gained weight and unclassified genera significantly increased at later growth stages. Operational taxonomic unit (OTU) distribution analysis showed that the bacterial community difference was most significant between growers and finishers, while analysis of shared OTUs indicated a greater proportion of common species between growers and finishers. The differential abundance test between growers and finishers detected that nearly half of the species were shared OTUs, suggesting that differential abundance of each bacterial species predominantly controls bacterial community differences. Although functions of these bacteria are yet to be identified, understanding differences in fecal microbiota between each growth stage will provide additional insights for further studies related to swine gut microbiota.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 91 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Denmark 1 1%
France 1 1%
Unknown 89 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 21%
Student > Master 15 16%
Student > Bachelor 13 14%
Researcher 11 12%
Student > Postgraduate 4 4%
Other 12 13%
Unknown 17 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 37 41%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 11 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 10%
Immunology and Microbiology 8 9%
Environmental Science 3 3%
Other 4 4%
Unknown 19 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 February 2016.
All research outputs
#14,807,084
of 22,797,621 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Microbiology
#1,779
of 2,770 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#148,501
of 263,845 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Microbiology
#4
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,797,621 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,770 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 263,845 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.