↓ Skip to main content

Two-stage optical system for colorectal polyp assessments

Overview of attention for article published in Surgical Endoscopy, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
Title
Two-stage optical system for colorectal polyp assessments
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy, April 2015
DOI 10.1007/s00464-015-4186-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mirosław Szura, Artur Pasternak, Krzysztof Bucki, Katarzyna Urbańczyk, Andrzej Matyja

Abstract

Macroscopic real-time evaluations of the histopathology and degree of invasion of colorectal polyps help to select the most suitable endoscopic treatment method. Dual-focus (DF) narrow-band imaging (NBI) is a new imaging enhancement system that uses digital and optical methods to enhance the view of blood vessels on mucosal surfaces. However, the superiority of this technique over standard imaging techniques has not been previously reported. The aim of this study was to determine whether the two-stage optical systems in a new generation of endoscopes will increase the diagnostic accuracy of colorectal polyp recognition. The study included 270 patients, and 386 colorectal polyps were diagnosed and removed. The polyps were assessed with white light and NBI using one- and two-stage optical systems, respectively. After being classified according to the Kudo pit pattern schemes, the polyps were removed and histopathologically verified. Regarding non-neoplastic lesions (Kudo I and II), no difference was observed in the recognition of polyps when using the NBI-DF function. We observed improved accuracy in the preliminary diagnoses of Kudo IIIL lesions (from 87.16 to 90.09 %, p < 0.05) and Kudo IIIS lesions (from 87.29 to 92.79 %, p < 0.01). NBI-DF also increased the accuracy of preliminary diagnoses of Kudo IV lesions (from 88.24 to 94.12 %, p < 0.01). The Kudo V pit patterns were also more distinct with NBI-DF imaging, increasing the diagnostic accuracy from 91.67 to 100 %. Using a two-stage optical system with electronic colorization of the mucosa increased diagnostic accuracy for differentiating colorectal polyps with neoplastic potential.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 24 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 17%
Student > Bachelor 3 13%
Student > Master 3 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 8%
Other 3 13%
Unknown 7 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 29%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 17%
Engineering 3 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 8%
Unknown 8 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 April 2015.
All research outputs
#17,752,946
of 22,797,621 outputs
Outputs from Surgical Endoscopy
#4,373
of 6,031 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#180,354
of 263,915 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Surgical Endoscopy
#42
of 71 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,797,621 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,031 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 263,915 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 71 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.