↓ Skip to main content

Experiences of using the Theoretical Domains Framework across diverse clinical environments: a qualitative study

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#24 of 953)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
12 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
166 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
366 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Experiences of using the Theoretical Domains Framework across diverse clinical environments: a qualitative study
Published in
Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare, March 2015
DOI 10.2147/jmdh.s78458
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cameron J Phillips, Andrea P Marshall, Nadia J Chaves, Stacey K Jankelowitz, Ivan B Lin, Clement T Loy, Gwyneth Rees, Leanne Sakzewski, Susie Thomas, The-Phung To, Shelley A Wilkinson, Susan Michie

Abstract

The Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) is an integrative framework developed from a synthesis of psychological theories as a vehicle to help apply theoretical approaches to interventions aimed at behavior change. This study explores experiences of TDF use by professionals from multiple disciplines across diverse clinical settings. Mixed methods were used to examine experiences, attitudes, and perspectives of health professionals in using the TDF in health care implementation projects. Individual interviews were conducted with ten health care professionals from six disciplines who used the TDF in implementation projects. Deductive content and thematic analysis were used. Three main themes and associated subthemes were identified including: 1) reasons for use of the TDF (increased confidence, broader perspective, and theoretical underpinnings); 2) challenges using the TDF (time and resources, operationalization of the TDF) and; 3) future use of the TDF. The TDF provided a useful, flexible framework for a diverse group of health professionals working across different clinical settings for the assessment of barriers and targeting resources to influence behavior change for implementation projects. The development of practical tools and training or support is likely to aid the utility of TDF.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 366 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 361 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 76 21%
Student > Master 51 14%
Researcher 49 13%
Student > Bachelor 28 8%
Other 22 6%
Other 60 16%
Unknown 80 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 77 21%
Nursing and Health Professions 59 16%
Psychology 43 12%
Social Sciences 32 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 10 3%
Other 51 14%
Unknown 94 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 46. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 November 2023.
All research outputs
#883,150
of 24,840,108 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare
#24
of 953 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,054
of 261,768 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,840,108 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 953 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 261,768 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them