↓ Skip to main content

Performance of single versus mixed coral species for transplantation to restore degraded reefs

Overview of attention for article published in Restoration Ecology, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
143 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Performance of single versus mixed coral species for transplantation to restore degraded reefs
Published in
Restoration Ecology, April 2015
DOI 10.1111/rec.12205
Authors

Patrick C. Cabaitan, Helen T. Yap, Edgardo D. Gomez

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 143 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Singapore 1 <1%
Unknown 140 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 31 22%
Researcher 29 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 13%
Student > Bachelor 11 8%
Other 11 8%
Other 18 13%
Unknown 24 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 52 36%
Environmental Science 44 31%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 7 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 3%
Chemistry 2 1%
Other 5 3%
Unknown 29 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 April 2015.
All research outputs
#19,955,316
of 24,525,936 outputs
Outputs from Restoration Ecology
#1,476
of 1,659 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#198,817
of 268,321 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Restoration Ecology
#21
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,525,936 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,659 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 268,321 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.