| Title |
Will 18F-Sodium Fluoride PET-CT Imaging Be the Magic Bullet for Identifying Vulnerable Coronary Atherosclerotic Plaques?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Current Cardiology Reports, August 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11886-014-0521-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nikhil V. Joshi, Alex Vesey, David E. Newby, Marc R. Dweck |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Iceland | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 1 | 2% |
| Denmark | 1 | 2% |
| Belgium | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 61 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 23% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 13% |
| Researcher | 6 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 13 | 20% |
| Unknown | 13 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 25 | 39% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 11% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 5% |
| Engineering | 3 | 5% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 8 | 13% |
| Unknown | 16 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 January 2016.
All research outputs
#15,648,868
of 24,787,209 outputs
Outputs from Current Cardiology Reports
#637
of 1,100 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#124,577
of 236,015 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Cardiology Reports
#5
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,787,209 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,100 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 236,015 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.