↓ Skip to main content

Subtropical giant podzol chronosequence reveals that soil carbon stabilisation is not governed by litter quality

Overview of attention for article published in Biogeochemistry, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
51 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Subtropical giant podzol chronosequence reveals that soil carbon stabilisation is not governed by litter quality
Published in
Biogeochemistry, April 2015
DOI 10.1007/s10533-015-0093-4
Authors

Andrew R. Jones, Jonathan Sanderman, Diane Allen, Ram Dalal, Susanne Schmidt

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Argentina 1 2%
Unknown 50 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 14%
Student > Postgraduate 5 10%
Professor 4 8%
Student > Master 3 6%
Other 11 22%
Unknown 10 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 31%
Environmental Science 14 27%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 3 6%
Unspecified 1 2%
Chemistry 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 15 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 April 2015.
All research outputs
#18,816,327
of 23,318,744 outputs
Outputs from Biogeochemistry
#890
of 1,072 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#194,572
of 265,228 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biogeochemistry
#17
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,318,744 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,072 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 265,228 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.