↓ Skip to main content

Application of CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing to the study and treatment of disease

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Toxicology, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
3 X users
patent
2 patents
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
47 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
265 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Application of CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing to the study and treatment of disease
Published in
Archives of Toxicology, April 2015
DOI 10.1007/s00204-015-1504-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andrea Pellagatti, Hamid Dolatshad, Simona Valletta, Jacqueline Boultwood

Abstract

CRISPR/Cas is a microbial adaptive immune system that uses RNA-guided nucleases to cleave foreign genetic elements. The CRISPR/Cas9 method has been engineered from the type II prokaryotic CRISPR system and uses a single-guide RNA to target the Cas9 nuclease to a specific genomic sequence. Cas9 induces double-stranded DNA breaks which are repaired either by imperfect non-homologous end joining to generate insertions or deletions (indels) or, if a repair template is provided, by homology-directed repair. Due to its specificity, simplicity and versatility, the CRISPR/Cas9 system has recently emerged as a powerful tool for genome engineering in various species. This technology can be used to investigate the function of a gene of interest or to correct gene mutations in cells via genome editing, paving the way for future gene therapy approaches. Improvements to the efficiency of CRISPR repair, in particular to increase the rate of gene correction and to reduce undesired off-target effects, and the development of more effective delivery methods will be required for its broad therapeutic application.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 265 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Ghana 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
Peru 1 <1%
Russia 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 256 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 71 27%
Student > Master 42 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 11%
Researcher 29 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 3%
Other 24 9%
Unknown 60 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 75 28%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 70 26%
Medicine and Dentistry 21 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 13 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 8 3%
Other 17 6%
Unknown 61 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 July 2020.
All research outputs
#1,396,077
of 22,797,621 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Toxicology
#84
of 2,638 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,597
of 264,674 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Toxicology
#4
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,797,621 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,638 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,674 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.