↓ Skip to main content

A meta‐analysis of context‐dependency in plant response to inoculation with mycorrhizal fungi

Overview of attention for article published in Ecology Letters, February 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
6 X users
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
883 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1054 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A meta‐analysis of context‐dependency in plant response to inoculation with mycorrhizal fungi
Published in
Ecology Letters, February 2010
DOI 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2009.01430.x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jason D. Hoeksema, V. Bala Chaudhary, Catherine A. Gehring, Nancy Collins Johnson, Justine Karst, Roger T. Koide, Anne Pringle, Catherine Zabinski, James D. Bever, John C. Moore, Gail W. T. Wilson, John N. Klironomos, James Umbanhowar

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,054 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 18 2%
Canada 5 <1%
Brazil 5 <1%
Argentina 4 <1%
Switzerland 2 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
Mexico 2 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Other 10 <1%
Unknown 1004 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 257 24%
Researcher 172 16%
Student > Master 150 14%
Student > Bachelor 100 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 55 5%
Other 154 15%
Unknown 166 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 574 54%
Environmental Science 164 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 36 3%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 27 3%
Engineering 8 <1%
Other 34 3%
Unknown 211 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 August 2023.
All research outputs
#1,299,207
of 24,712,008 outputs
Outputs from Ecology Letters
#741
of 3,060 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,298
of 98,473 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecology Letters
#5
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,712,008 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,060 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 98,473 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.