↓ Skip to main content

Year in review in Intensive Care Medicine 2014: II. ARDS, airway management, ventilation, adjuvants in sepsis, hepatic failure, symptoms assessment and management, palliative care and support for…

Overview of attention for article published in Intensive Care Medicine, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
93 Mendeley
Title
Year in review in Intensive Care Medicine 2014: II. ARDS, airway management, ventilation, adjuvants in sepsis, hepatic failure, symptoms assessment and management, palliative care and support for families, prognostication, organ donation, outcome, organisation and research methodology
Published in
Intensive Care Medicine, February 2015
DOI 10.1007/s00134-015-3707-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anders Perner, Giuseppe Citerio, Jan Bakker, Matteo Bassetti, Dominique Benoit, Maurizio Cecconi, J. Randall Curtis, Gordon S. Doig, Margaret Herridge, Samir Jaber, Michael Joannidis, Laurent Papazian, Mark J. Peters, Pierre Singer, Martin Smith, Marcio Soares, Antoni Torres, Antoine Vieillard-Baron, Jean-François Timsit, Elie Azoulay

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 93 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 1 1%
Portugal 1 1%
Czechia 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 89 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 12 13%
Researcher 11 12%
Student > Master 7 8%
Student > Bachelor 7 8%
Student > Postgraduate 6 6%
Other 27 29%
Unknown 23 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 38 41%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 10%
Psychology 3 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 2%
Other 9 10%
Unknown 30 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 April 2015.
All research outputs
#18,405,265
of 22,797,621 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#4,424
of 4,977 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#185,587
of 255,466 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#66
of 91 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,797,621 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,977 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.0. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 255,466 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 91 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.