↓ Skip to main content

Primary Care Physicians’ Use of an Electronic Medical Record System: A Cognitive Task Analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of General Internal Medicine, January 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
148 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
296 Mendeley
citeulike
5 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
Title
Primary Care Physicians’ Use of an Electronic Medical Record System: A Cognitive Task Analysis
Published in
Journal of General Internal Medicine, January 2009
DOI 10.1007/s11606-008-0892-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Aviv Shachak, Michal Hadas-Dayagi, Amitai Ziv, Shmuel Reis

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 296 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 14 5%
Canada 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Pakistan 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Nigeria 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 273 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 57 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 43 15%
Researcher 41 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 22 7%
Student > Postgraduate 19 6%
Other 66 22%
Unknown 48 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 90 30%
Computer Science 47 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 19 6%
Engineering 18 6%
Social Sciences 17 6%
Other 47 16%
Unknown 58 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 July 2019.
All research outputs
#15,810,483
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#5,521
of 8,256 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#156,619
of 187,919 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#28
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,256 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.2. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 187,919 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.