↓ Skip to main content

More mentoring needed? A cross-sectional study of mentoring programs for medical students in Germany

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Education, September 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
51 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
126 Mendeley
Title
More mentoring needed? A cross-sectional study of mentoring programs for medical students in Germany
Published in
BMC Medical Education, September 2011
DOI 10.1186/1472-6920-11-68
Pubmed ID
Authors

Felix G Meinel, Konstantinos Dimitriadis, Philip von der Borch, Sylvère Störmann, Sophie Niedermaier, Martin R Fischer

Abstract

Despite increasing recognition that mentoring is essential early in medical careers, little is known about the prevalence of mentoring programs for medical students. We conducted this study to survey all medical schools in Germany regarding the prevalence of mentoring programs for medical students as well as the characteristics, goals and effectiveness of these programs.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 126 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 2%
United States 2 2%
Australia 1 <1%
Pakistan 1 <1%
Thailand 1 <1%
Philippines 1 <1%
Unknown 118 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 19 15%
Student > Master 18 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 9 7%
Student > Bachelor 7 6%
Other 33 26%
Unknown 28 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 43 34%
Social Sciences 21 17%
Psychology 12 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 2%
Environmental Science 3 2%
Other 15 12%
Unknown 29 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 February 2012.
All research outputs
#15,236,094
of 22,653,392 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Education
#2,252
of 3,290 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#90,905
of 130,802 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Education
#17
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,653,392 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,290 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 130,802 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.