↓ Skip to main content

Is exercise effective for the management of subacromial impingement syndrome and other soft tissue injuries of the shoulder? A systematic review by the Ontario Protocol for Traffic Injury Management (O…

Overview of attention for article published in Musculoskeletal Science and Practice, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
91 X users
facebook
9 Facebook pages
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
83 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
596 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Is exercise effective for the management of subacromial impingement syndrome and other soft tissue injuries of the shoulder? A systematic review by the Ontario Protocol for Traffic Injury Management (OPTIMa) Collaboration
Published in
Musculoskeletal Science and Practice, April 2015
DOI 10.1016/j.math.2015.03.013
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sean Y. Abdulla, Danielle Southerst, Pierre Côté, Heather M. Shearer, Deborah Sutton, Kristi Randhawa, Sharanya Varatharajan, Jessica J. Wong, Hainan Yu, Andrée-Anne Marchand, Karen Chrobak, Erin Woitzik, Yaadwinder Shergill, Brad Ferguson, Maja Stupar, Margareta Nordin, Craig Jacobs, Silvano Mior, Linda J. Carroll, Gabrielle van der Velde, Anne Taylor-Vaisey

Abstract

Exercise is a key component of rehabilitation for soft tissue injuries of the shoulder; however its effectiveness remains unclear. Determine the effectiveness of exercise for shoulder pain. We searched seven databases from 1990 to 2015 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs), cohort and case control studies comparing exercise to other interventions for shoulder pain. We critically appraised eligible studies using the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) criteria. We synthesized findings from scientifically admissible studies using best-evidence synthesis methodology. We retrieved 4853 articles. Eleven RCTs were appraised and five had a low risk of bias. Four studies addressed subacromial impingement syndrome. One study addressed nonspecific shoulder pain. For variable duration subacromial impingement syndrome: 1) supervised strengthening leads to greater short-term improvement in pain and disability over wait listing; and 2) supervised and home-based strengthening and stretching leads to greater short-term improvement in pain and disability compared to no treatment. For persistent subacromial impingement syndrome: 1) supervised and home-based strengthening leads to similar outcomes as surgery; and 2) home-based heavy load eccentric training does not add benefits to home-based rotator cuff strengthening and physiotherapy. For variable duration low-grade nonspecific shoulder pain, supervised strengthening and stretching leads to similar short-term outcomes as corticosteroid injections or multimodal care. The evidence suggests that supervised and home-based progressive shoulder strengthening and stretching are effective for the management of subacromial impingement syndrome. For low-grade nonspecific shoulder pain, supervised strengthening and stretching are equally effective to corticosteroid injections or multimodal care. CRD42013003928.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 91 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 596 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Unknown 592 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 112 19%
Student > Master 97 16%
Student > Postgraduate 40 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 40 7%
Other 32 5%
Other 113 19%
Unknown 162 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 163 27%
Nursing and Health Professions 146 24%
Sports and Recreations 47 8%
Engineering 13 2%
Social Sciences 9 2%
Other 38 6%
Unknown 180 30%