↓ Skip to main content

Negative and positive control ranges in the bacterial reverse mutation test: JEMS/BMS collaborative study

Overview of attention for article published in Genes and Environment, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
Title
Negative and positive control ranges in the bacterial reverse mutation test: JEMS/BMS collaborative study
Published in
Genes and Environment, April 2018
DOI 10.1186/s41021-018-0096-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Masayuki Kato, Kei-ichi Sugiyama, Toshiro Fukushima, Yasuyoshi Miura, Takumi Awogi, Shigetomo Hikosaka, Kumiko Kawakami, Madoka Nakajima, Masato Nakamura, Hajime Sui, Kumiko Watanabe, Atsushi Hakura

Abstract

A large-scale study was conducted by multiple laboratories affiliated with the Japanese Environmental Mutagen Society and the Bacterial Mutagenicity Study Group to investigate possible proficiency indicators for the bacterial reverse mutation test with a preincubation procedure. Approximately 30 laboratories generated negative and positive control count data and dose-response curves of the positive control articles for the bacterial reverse mutation test, with assays conducted annually from 2013 to 2016. Overall, the majority of the negative and positive control counts for Salmonella Typhimurium strains TA100, TA1535, TA98, and TA1537, and Escherichia coli strain WP2uvrA, with and without S9 mix, were within the range of the means ±2× standard deviation. The negative counts were normally distributed (strains TA100, TA98, and WP2uvrA) or followed Poisson distribution (strains TA1535 and TA1537), and the positive control counts for all strains were approximately normally distributed. In addition, the distribution of the negative and positive control counts was relatively constant over the 4 years. The number of revertant colonies increased in a dose-dependent linear or exponential fashion up to the recommended doses for the respective positive control articles in Japan. These data are valuable for determining the acceptance criteria and an estimation of the laboratory proficiency for the bacterial reverse mutation test.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 11 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 3 27%
Student > Bachelor 1 9%
Unspecified 1 9%
Other 1 9%
Student > Master 1 9%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 18%
Environmental Science 1 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 9%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 9%
Other 1 9%
Unknown 4 36%