Title |
Supplemental treatment of rheumatoid arthritis with natural milk antibodies against enteromicrobes and their toxins: results of an open-labelled pilot study
|
---|---|
Published in |
Nutrition Journal, January 2011
|
DOI | 10.1186/1475-2891-10-2 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Kou Katayama, Takeo Matsuno, Takaki Waritani, Kuniaki Terato, Hiroshi Shionoya |
Abstract |
Environmental factors, particularly commensal bacteria in the gastrointestinal tract, may be involved in the pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The aim of this study was to evaluate whether natural milk antibodies against a wide spectrum of pathogenic enteromicobes and their toxins modify the disease activity in RA. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Netherlands | 2 | 4% |
Japan | 1 | 2% |
United States | 1 | 2% |
Denmark | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 50 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 11 | 20% |
Student > Bachelor | 7 | 13% |
Other | 6 | 11% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 7% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 7% |
Other | 13 | 24% |
Unknown | 10 | 18% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 19 | 35% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 22% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 4 | 7% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 4% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 2% |
Other | 6 | 11% |
Unknown | 11 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2024.
All research outputs
#20,406,981
of 25,082,430 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition Journal
#1,342
of 1,500 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#172,758
of 193,251 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition Journal
#23
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,082,430 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,500 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.5. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 193,251 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.