↓ Skip to main content

Toward knowledge-based liver surgery: holistic information processing for surgical decision support

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
45 Mendeley
Title
Toward knowledge-based liver surgery: holistic information processing for surgical decision support
Published in
International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery, April 2015
DOI 10.1007/s11548-015-1187-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

K. März, M. Hafezi, T. Weller, A. Saffari, M. Nolden, N. Fard, A. Majlesara, S. Zelzer, M. Maleshkova, M. Volovyk, N. Gharabaghi, M. Wagner, G. Emami, S. Engelhardt, A. Fetzer, H. Kenngott, N. Rezai, A. Rettinger, R. Studer, A. Mehrabi, L. Maier-Hein

Abstract

Malignant neoplasms of the liver are among the most frequent cancers worldwide. Given the diversity of options for liver cancer therapy, the choice of treatment depends on various parameters including patient condition, tumor size and location, liver function, and previous interventions. To address this issue, we present the first approach to treatment strategy planning based on holistic processing of patient-individual data, practical knowledge (i.e., case knowledge), and factual knowledge (e.g., clinical guidelines and studies). The contributions of this paper are as follows: (1) a formalized dynamic patient model that incorporates all the heterogeneous data acquired for a specific patient in the whole course of disease treatment; (2) a concept for formalizing factual knowledge; and (3) a technical infrastructure that enables storing, accessing, and processing of heterogeneous data to support clinical decision making. Our patient model, which currently covers 602 patient-individual parameters, was successfully instantiated for 184 patients. It was sufficiently comprehensive to serve as the basis for the formalization of a total of 72 rules extracted from studies on patients with colorectal liver metastases or hepatocellular carcinoma. For a subset of 70 patients with these diagnoses, the system derived an average of [Formula: see text] assertions per patient. The proposed concept paves the way for holistic treatment strategy planning by enabling joint storing and processing of heterogeneous data from various information sources.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Portugal 1 2%
France 1 2%
Unknown 42 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 13 29%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 18%
Researcher 6 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 9%
Other 2 4%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 10 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 10 22%
Engineering 8 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Other 6 13%
Unknown 13 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 January 2016.
All research outputs
#17,752,946
of 22,797,621 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery
#587
of 845 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#180,969
of 264,847 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery
#23
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,797,621 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 845 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,847 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.