↓ Skip to main content

Open-source image registration for MRI–TRUS fusion-guided prostate interventions

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
42 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
68 Mendeley
Title
Open-source image registration for MRI–TRUS fusion-guided prostate interventions
Published in
International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery, April 2015
DOI 10.1007/s11548-015-1180-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andriy Fedorov, Siavash Khallaghi, C. Antonio Sánchez, Andras Lasso, Sidney Fels, Kemal Tuncali, Emily Neubauer Sugar, Tina Kapur, Chenxi Zhang, William Wells, Paul L. Nguyen, Purang Abolmaesumi, Clare Tempany

Abstract

We propose two software tools for non-rigid registration of MRI and transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) images of the prostate. Our ultimate goal is to develop an open-source solution to support MRI-TRUS fusion image guidance of prostate interventions, such as targeted biopsy for prostate cancer detection and focal therapy. It is widely hypothesized that image registration is an essential component in such systems. The two non-rigid registration methods are: (1) a deformable registration of the prostate segmentation distance maps with B-spline regularization and (2) a finite element-based deformable registration of the segmentation surfaces in the presence of partial data. We evaluate the methods retrospectively using clinical patient image data collected during standard clinical procedures. Computation time and Target Registration Error (TRE) calculated at the expert-identified anatomical landmarks were used as quantitative measures for the evaluation. The presented image registration tools were capable of completing deformable registration computation within 5 min. Average TRE was approximately 3 mm for both methods, which is comparable with the slice thickness in our MRI data. Both tools are available under nonrestrictive open-source license. We release open-source tools that may be used for registration during MRI-TRUS-guided prostate interventions. Our tools implement novel registration approaches and produce acceptable registration results. We believe these tools will lower the barriers in development and deployment of interventional research solutions and facilitate comparison with similar tools.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 4%
Unknown 65 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 20 29%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 19%
Student > Master 9 13%
Other 5 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 6%
Other 9 13%
Unknown 8 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 26%
Engineering 15 22%
Computer Science 9 13%
Physics and Astronomy 6 9%
Mathematics 2 3%
Other 4 6%
Unknown 14 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 November 2019.
All research outputs
#6,952,116
of 22,797,621 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery
#198
of 845 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#82,600
of 264,847 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery
#6
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,797,621 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 845 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,847 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.