↓ Skip to main content

Increased Cell Membrane Capacitance is the Dominant Mechanism of Stretch-Dependent Conduction Slowing in the Rabbit Heart: A Computational Study

Overview of attention for article published in Cellular and Molecular Bioengineering, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
30 Mendeley
Title
Increased Cell Membrane Capacitance is the Dominant Mechanism of Stretch-Dependent Conduction Slowing in the Rabbit Heart: A Computational Study
Published in
Cellular and Molecular Bioengineering, March 2015
DOI 10.1007/s12195-015-0384-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bernardo L. de Oliveira, Emily R. Pfeiffer, Joakim Sundnes, Samuel T. Wall, Andrew D. McCulloch

Abstract

Volume loading of the cardiac ventricles is known to slow electrical conduction in the rabbit heart, but the mechanisms remain unclear. Previous experimental and modeling studies have investigated some of these mechanisms, including stretch-activated membrane currents, reduced gap junctional conductance, and altered cell membrane capacitance. In order to quantify the relative contributions of these mechanisms, we combined a monomain model of rabbit ventricular electrophysiology with a hyperelastic model of passive ventricular mechanics. First, a simplified geometric model with prescribed homogeneous deformation was used to fit model parameters and characterize individual MEF mechanisms, and showed good qualitative agreement with experimentally measured strain-CV relations. A 3D model of the rabbit left and right ventricles was then compared with experimental measurements from optical electrical mapping studies in the isolated rabbit heart. The model was inflated to an end-diastolic pressure of 30 mmHg, resulting in epicardial strains comparable to those measured in the anterior left ventricular free wall. While the effects of stretch activated channels did alter epicardial conduction velocity, an increase in cellular capacitance was required to explain previously reported experimental results. The new results suggest that for large strains, various mechanisms can combine and produce a biphasic relationship between strain and conduction velocity. However, at the moderate strains generated by high end-diastolic pressure, a stretch-induced increase in myocyte membrane capacitance is the dominant driver of conduction slowing during ventricular volume loading.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 3%
Unknown 29 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 27%
Student > Bachelor 5 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 17%
Professor 3 10%
Other 2 7%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 4 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 6 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 10%
Neuroscience 2 7%
Other 6 20%
Unknown 6 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 April 2015.
All research outputs
#17,752,946
of 22,797,621 outputs
Outputs from Cellular and Molecular Bioengineering
#347
of 458 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#180,041
of 263,357 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cellular and Molecular Bioengineering
#7
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,797,621 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 458 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 263,357 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.