↓ Skip to main content

The Gut Microbiome in Multiple Sclerosis

Overview of attention for article published in Current Treatment Options in Neurology, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#20 of 499)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
28 X users
facebook
13 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
89 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
247 Mendeley
Title
The Gut Microbiome in Multiple Sclerosis
Published in
Current Treatment Options in Neurology, April 2015
DOI 10.1007/s11940-015-0344-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Daniel W. Mielcarz, Lloyd H. Kasper

Abstract

The gut microbiome is made up of a wide range of (chiefly) bacterial species that colonize the small and large intestine. The human gut microbiome contains a subset of thousands of bacterial species, with up to 10(14) total bacteria. Studies examining this bacterial content have shown wide variations in which species are present between individuals. The gut microbiome has been shown to have profound effects on the development and maintenance of immune system in both animal models and in humans. A growing body of evidence has implicated the human gut microbiome in a range of disorders, including obesity, inflammatory bowel diseases, and cardiovascular disease. Animal studies present compelling evidence that the gut microbiome plays a significant role in the progression of demyelinating disease, and that modulation of the microbiome can lead to either exacerbation or amelioration of symptoms. Differences in diet, vitamin D insufficiency, smoking, and alcohol use have all been implicated as risk factors in MS, and all have the ability to affect the composition of the gut microbiota. Preliminary clinical trials aimed at modulating the gut microbiota in MS patients are underway and may prove to be a promising and lower-risk treatment option in the future.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 28 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 247 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 243 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 42 17%
Researcher 32 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 31 13%
Student > Bachelor 27 11%
Other 17 7%
Other 46 19%
Unknown 52 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 61 25%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 28 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 25 10%
Neuroscience 23 9%
Immunology and Microbiology 20 8%
Other 30 12%
Unknown 60 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 September 2017.
All research outputs
#1,379,683
of 25,768,270 outputs
Outputs from Current Treatment Options in Neurology
#20
of 499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,116
of 280,821 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Treatment Options in Neurology
#1
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,768,270 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,821 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.