↓ Skip to main content

The impact of emotional well-being on long-term recovery and survival in physical illness: a meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Behavioral Medicine, September 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#17 of 1,147)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
27 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
9 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
186 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
324 Mendeley
Title
The impact of emotional well-being on long-term recovery and survival in physical illness: a meta-analysis
Published in
Journal of Behavioral Medicine, September 2011
DOI 10.1007/s10865-011-9379-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sanne M. A. Lamers, Linda Bolier, Gerben J. Westerhof, Filip Smit, Ernst T. Bohlmeijer

Abstract

This meta-analysis synthesized studies on emotional well-being as predictor of the prognosis of physical illness, while in addition evaluating the impact of putative moderators, namely constructs of well-being, health-related outcome, year of publication, follow-up time and methodological quality of the included studies. The search in reference lists and electronic databases (Medline and PsycInfo) identified 17 eligible studies examining the impact of general well-being, positive affect and life satisfaction on recovery and survival in physically ill patients. Meta-analytically combining these studies revealed a Likelihood Ratio of 1.14, indicating a small but significant effect. Higher levels of emotional well-being are beneficial for recovery and survival in physically ill patients. The findings show that emotional well-being predicts long-term prognosis of physical illness. This suggests that enhancement of emotional well-being may improve the prognosis of physical illness, which should be investigated by future research.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 324 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 316 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 63 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 42 13%
Student > Bachelor 38 12%
Researcher 34 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 17 5%
Other 46 14%
Unknown 84 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 97 30%
Medicine and Dentistry 44 14%
Social Sciences 25 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 19 6%
Engineering 7 2%
Other 35 11%
Unknown 97 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 228. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 September 2023.
All research outputs
#167,312
of 25,378,162 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Behavioral Medicine
#17
of 1,147 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#523
of 137,421 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Behavioral Medicine
#1
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,378,162 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,147 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 137,421 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them