↓ Skip to main content

Total removal of a trigeminal schwannoma via the expanded endoscopic endonasal approach. Technical note

Overview of attention for article published in Acta Neurochirurgica, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
Title
Total removal of a trigeminal schwannoma via the expanded endoscopic endonasal approach. Technical note
Published in
Acta Neurochirurgica, April 2015
DOI 10.1007/s00701-015-2409-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Timothée Jacquesson, Moncef Berhouma, Thiébaud Picart, Emmanuel Jouanneau

Abstract

Because of their deep location surrounded by closed numerous neurovascular structures, skull base tumors of the cavernous sinus are still difficult to manage. Recently, the endoscopic endonasal approach commonly used for pituitary tumor resection has been "expanded" to the parasellar, infratemporal and orbital compartments with some advantages compared to the intracranial route. The authors reported the case of a 49-year-old male presenting a large extradural tumor of the left cavernous sinus with extensions toward the orbit, sphenoid sinus and infratemporal fossa. His ophthalmological examination was normal, and the body CT scan revealed no primary neoplasm. In this operative video, the approach is described step by step with surgical nuances. The endoscopy provided a close-up panoramic view and various angles of vision. Also, it avoided an invasive craniotomy, cerebral retraction and cranial nerves damages. Thus, it allowed the total removal of this tumor originating from the maxillary branch of the trigeminal nerve. The pathologic examination confirmed a schwannoma. The expanded endoscopic endonasal approach provides an interesting corridor to cavernous sinus tumors with satisfactory control of extensions inferiorly toward the infratemporal fossa, anteriorly via the superior orbital fissure and medially within the sphenoid. Finally, the skull base surgeon has to master this anterior endoscopic route as well as all the other "open" transcranial skull base approaches to propose the best surgical route fitting the tumor characteristics.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 27 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 11%
Researcher 2 7%
Student > Bachelor 2 7%
Student > Postgraduate 2 7%
Other 7 26%
Unknown 8 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 44%
Neuroscience 4 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 4%
Unknown 10 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 April 2015.
All research outputs
#17,752,946
of 22,797,621 outputs
Outputs from Acta Neurochirurgica
#1,478
of 1,911 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#180,969
of 264,847 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta Neurochirurgica
#9
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,797,621 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,911 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,847 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.