| Title |
Revisional Bariatric Surgery Following Failed Primary Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: A Systematic Review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Obesity Surgery, June 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11695-014-1332-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Douglas Cheung, Noah J. Switzer, Richdeep S. Gill, Xinzhe Shi, Shahzeer Karmali |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 140 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 138 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 17 | 12% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 14 | 10% |
| Other | 13 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 6% |
| Other | 31 | 22% |
| Unknown | 43 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 78 | 56% |
| Psychology | 4 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 5 | 4% |
| Unknown | 45 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 September 2014.
All research outputs
#20,267,098
of 22,797,621 outputs
Outputs from Obesity Surgery
#3,002
of 3,371 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#192,997
of 228,273 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Obesity Surgery
#42
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,797,621 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,371 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,273 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.