↓ Skip to main content

Farmer-Managed Natural Regeneration Enhances Rural Livelihoods in Dryland West Africa

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Management, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
78 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
349 Mendeley
Title
Farmer-Managed Natural Regeneration Enhances Rural Livelihoods in Dryland West Africa
Published in
Environmental Management, April 2015
DOI 10.1007/s00267-015-0469-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Peter Weston, Reaksmey Hong, Carolyn Kaboré, Christian A. Kull

Abstract

Declining agricultural productivity, land clearance and climate change are compounding the vulnerability of already marginal rural populations in West Africa. 'Farmer-Managed Natural Regeneration' (FMNR) is an approach to arable land restoration and reforestation that seeks to reconcile sustained food production, conservation of soils, and protection of biodiversity. It involves selecting and protecting the most vigorous stems regrowing from live stumps of felled trees, pruning off all other stems, and pollarding the chosen stems to grow into straight trunks. Despite widespread enthusiasm and application of FMNR by environmental management and development projects, to date, no research has provided a measure of the aggregate livelihood impact of community adoption of FMNR. This paper places FMNR in the context of other agroforestry initiatives, then seeks to quantify the value of livelihood outcomes of FMNR. We review published and unpublished evidence about the impacts of FMNR, and present a new case study that addresses gaps in the evidence-base. The case study focuses on a FMNR project in the district of Talensi in the semi-arid Upper East Region in Ghana. The case study employs a social return on investment analysis, which identifies proxy financial values for non-economic as well as economic benefits. The results demonstrate income and agricultural benefits, but also show that asset creation, increased consumption of wild resources, health improvements, and psycho-social benefits created more value in FMNR-adopting households during the period of the study than increases in income and agricultural yields.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 349 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Cameroon 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 341 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 74 21%
Researcher 64 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 41 12%
Student > Bachelor 20 6%
Student > Postgraduate 14 4%
Other 45 13%
Unknown 91 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 73 21%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 63 18%
Social Sciences 34 10%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 18 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 3%
Other 42 12%
Unknown 107 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2018.
All research outputs
#6,885,678
of 25,760,414 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Management
#579
of 1,934 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#74,491
of 280,196 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Management
#7
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,760,414 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,934 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,196 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.