| Title |
Deamidation of Gliadin Peptides in Lamina Propria: Implications for Celiac Disease
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Digestive Diseases and Sciences, August 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10620-008-0450-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
H. Skovbjerg, D. Anthonsen, E. Knudsen, H. Sjöström |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 19 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 6 | 30% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 15% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 5% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 4 | 20% |
| Unknown | 1 | 5% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 40% |
| Chemistry | 4 | 20% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 10% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 2 | 10% |
| Unknown | 1 | 5% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 June 2015.
All research outputs
#2,233,343
of 23,854,458 outputs
Outputs from Digestive Diseases and Sciences
#244
of 4,304 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,096
of 84,414 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Digestive Diseases and Sciences
#1
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,854,458 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,304 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 84,414 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.