| Title |
Habitat selection by wolvesCanis lupus in the uplands and mountains of southern Poland
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Mammal Research, September 2005
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf03192636 |
| Authors |
Włodzimierz Jędrzejewski, Magdalena Niedzialkowska, Robert W. Mysłajek, Sabina Nowak, Bogumiła Jędrzejewska |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Hong Kong | 1 | 33% |
| Ireland | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 33% |
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 220 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 4 | 2% |
| India | 3 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Bulgaria | 1 | <1% |
| Turkey | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 9 | 4% |
| Unknown | 196 | 89% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 52 | 24% |
| Student > Master | 42 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 36 | 16% |
| Other | 17 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 7% |
| Other | 29 | 13% |
| Unknown | 29 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 123 | 56% |
| Environmental Science | 51 | 23% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 6 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | <1% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 4 | 2% |
| Unknown | 32 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 April 2015.
All research outputs
#16,721,717
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Mammal Research
#571
of 875 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#61,202
of 69,132 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Mammal Research
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 875 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 69,132 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.