↓ Skip to main content

Comparing cities’ cycling patterns using online shared bicycle maps

Overview of attention for article published in Transportation, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
48 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
102 Mendeley
Title
Comparing cities’ cycling patterns using online shared bicycle maps
Published in
Transportation, April 2015
DOI 10.1007/s11116-015-9599-9
Authors

Advait Sarkar, Neal Lathia, Cecilia Mascolo

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 102 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 100 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 18%
Student > Master 16 16%
Student > Bachelor 10 10%
Researcher 8 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 5%
Other 16 16%
Unknown 29 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 22 22%
Computer Science 14 14%
Social Sciences 8 8%
Business, Management and Accounting 4 4%
Arts and Humanities 4 4%
Other 16 16%
Unknown 34 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 April 2015.
All research outputs
#7,661,332
of 23,322,966 outputs
Outputs from Transportation
#249
of 563 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#91,432
of 264,935 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Transportation
#12
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,322,966 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 563 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.5. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,935 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.