↓ Skip to main content

Neuronal activity biases axon selection for myelination in vivo

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Neuroscience, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
10 X users
patent
1 patent
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
362 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
507 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Neuronal activity biases axon selection for myelination in vivo
Published in
Nature Neuroscience, April 2015
DOI 10.1038/nn.3992
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jacob H Hines, Andrew M Ravanelli, Rani Schwindt, Ethan K Scott, Bruce Appel

Abstract

An essential feature of vertebrate neural development is ensheathment of axons with myelin, an insulating membrane formed by oligodendrocytes. Not all axons are myelinated, but mechanisms directing myelination of specific axons are unknown. Using zebrafish, we found that activity-dependent secretion stabilized myelin sheath formation on select axons. When VAMP2-dependent exocytosis was silenced in single axons, oligodendrocytes preferentially ensheathed neighboring axons. Nascent sheaths formed on silenced axons were shorter in length, but when activity of neighboring axons was also suppressed, inhibition of sheath growth was relieved. Using in vivo time-lapse microscopy, we found that only 25% of oligodendrocyte processes that initiated axon wrapping were stabilized during normal development and that initiation did not require activity. Instead, oligodendrocyte processes wrapping silenced axons retracted more frequently. We propose that axon selection for myelination results from excessive and indiscriminate initiation of wrapping followed by refinement that is biased by activity-dependent secretion from axons.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 507 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 <1%
United Kingdom 3 <1%
France 3 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Hungary 1 <1%
Russia 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 490 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 135 27%
Researcher 80 16%
Student > Master 54 11%
Student > Bachelor 49 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 30 6%
Other 70 14%
Unknown 89 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 184 36%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 101 20%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 43 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 24 5%
Engineering 14 3%
Other 43 8%
Unknown 98 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 39. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 September 2021.
All research outputs
#898,758
of 22,797,621 outputs
Outputs from Nature Neuroscience
#1,501
of 5,229 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,452
of 264,645 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Neuroscience
#40
of 78 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,797,621 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,229 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 53.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,645 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 78 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.