↓ Skip to main content

The Influence of Portion Size and Timing of Meals on Weight Balance and Obesity

Overview of attention for article published in Current Obesity Reports, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
98 Mendeley
Title
The Influence of Portion Size and Timing of Meals on Weight Balance and Obesity
Published in
Current Obesity Reports, January 2015
DOI 10.1007/s13679-015-0138-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christina Berg, Heléne Bertéus Forslund

Abstract

This review focuses on the influence of portion size and temporal distribution of food intake on weight balance and obesity in adults. The inconsistency of definitions in the area of meal patterns is also discussed. The conclusion is that regular eating habits might facilitate weight balance, while unplanned snacking as well as consuming the major part of the energy intake at the end of the day seem to be unfavourable. Altogether, the research suggests that large portions promote over-consumption and, therefore, limiting portion size of energy dense foods and drinks with added sugar could be recommended. Even if more research is needed, these factors should be taken into consideration in recommendations for obesity prevention.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 98 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 1%
Unknown 97 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 15 15%
Student > Bachelor 14 14%
Student > Master 12 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 9%
Other 6 6%
Other 20 20%
Unknown 22 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 20 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 17 17%
Psychology 9 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 4%
Other 11 11%
Unknown 30 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 January 2023.
All research outputs
#1,734,568
of 23,538,320 outputs
Outputs from Current Obesity Reports
#105
of 387 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,582
of 355,511 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Obesity Reports
#9
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,538,320 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 387 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 355,511 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.