↓ Skip to main content

Sociability in Fruit Flies: Genetic Variation, Heritability and Plasticity

Overview of attention for article published in Behavior Genetics, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
85 Mendeley
Title
Sociability in Fruit Flies: Genetic Variation, Heritability and Plasticity
Published in
Behavior Genetics, April 2018
DOI 10.1007/s10519-018-9901-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andrew M. Scott, Ian Dworkin, Reuven Dukas

Abstract

Sociability, defined as individuals' propensity to participate in non-aggressive activities with conspecifics, is a fundamental feature of behavior in many animals including humans. However, we still have a limited knowledge of the mechanisms and evolutionary biology of sociability. To enhance our understanding, we developed a new protocol to quantify sociability in fruit flies (Drosophila melanogaster). In a series of experiments with 59 F1 hybrids derived from inbred lines, we documented, first, significant genetic variation in sociability in both males and females, with broad-sense heritabilities of 0.24 and 0.21 respectively. Second, we observed little genetic correlation in sociability between the sexes. Third, we found genetic variation in social plasticity among the hybrids, with a broad-sense heritability of ~0.24. That is, genotypes differed in the degree of sociability after experiencing the same relevant social experience. Our data pave the way for further research on the mechanisms that underlie sociability as well as its ecological and evolutionary consequences.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 85 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 14 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 15%
Student > Master 10 12%
Researcher 7 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 2%
Other 7 8%
Unknown 32 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 23 27%
Neuroscience 10 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 7%
Psychology 6 7%
Environmental Science 2 2%
Other 6 7%
Unknown 32 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 September 2021.
All research outputs
#6,657,314
of 24,228,883 outputs
Outputs from Behavior Genetics
#323
of 936 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#110,345
of 330,129 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Behavior Genetics
#4
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,228,883 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 936 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,129 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.