↓ Skip to main content

Prevalence of the Alternative Lengthening of Telomeres Telomere Maintenance Mechanism in Human Cancer Subtypes

Overview of attention for article published in American Journal of Pathology, September 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
2 X users
patent
2 patents
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
419 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
360 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Prevalence of the Alternative Lengthening of Telomeres Telomere Maintenance Mechanism in Human Cancer Subtypes
Published in
American Journal of Pathology, September 2011
DOI 10.1016/j.ajpath.2011.06.018
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christopher M. Heaphy, Andrea P. Subhawong, Seung-Mo Hong, Michael G. Goggins, Elizabeth A. Montgomery, Edward Gabrielson, George J. Netto, Jonathan I. Epstein, Tamara L. Lotan, William H. Westra, Ie-Ming Shih, Christine A. Iacobuzio-Donahue, Anirban Maitra, Qing K. Li, Charles G. Eberhart, Janis M. Taube, Dinesh Rakheja, Robert J. Kurman, T.C. Wu, Richard B. Roden, Pedram Argani, Angelo M. De Marzo, Luigi Terracciano, Michael Torbenson, Alan K. Meeker

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 360 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Italy 2 <1%
India 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Poland 1 <1%
Serbia 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 347 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 84 23%
Researcher 47 13%
Student > Master 47 13%
Student > Bachelor 37 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 19 5%
Other 56 16%
Unknown 70 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 108 30%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 81 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 63 18%
Chemistry 7 2%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 1%
Other 21 6%
Unknown 76 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 May 2021.
All research outputs
#1,612,125
of 25,775,807 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Pathology
#283
of 5,954 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,237
of 136,928 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Pathology
#1
of 72 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,775,807 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,954 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 136,928 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 72 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.