↓ Skip to main content

Root traits explain different foraging strategies between resprouting life histories

Overview of attention for article published in Oecologia, October 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
84 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
264 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
Title
Root traits explain different foraging strategies between resprouting life histories
Published in
Oecologia, October 2010
DOI 10.1007/s00442-010-1806-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Susana Paula, Juli G. Pausas

Abstract

Drought and fire are prevalent disturbances in Mediterranean ecosystems. Plant species able to regrow after severe disturbances (i.e. resprouter life history) have higher allocation to roots and higher water potential during the dry season than coexisting non-resprouting species. However, seedlings of non-resprouters have a higher survival rate after summer drought. We predict that, to counteract their shallow-rooting systems and to maximize seedling survival, non-resprouters have root traits that confer higher efficiency in soil resource acquisition than resprouters. We tested this prediction in seedlings of less than 1.5 months old. We select 13 coexisting woody species (including both resprouters and non-resprouters), grew them in a common garden and measured the following root traits: length, surface, average diameter, root tissue density (RTD), specific root length (SRL), surface:volume ratio (SVR), specific tip density (STD), tip distribution in depth, internal links ratio (ILR), and degree of branching. These root traits were compared between the two resprouting life histories using both standard cross-species and phylogenetic-informed analysis. Non-resprouters showed higher SRL and longer, thinner and more branched laterals, especially in the upper soil layers. The external links (i.e. the most absorptive root region) were also more abundant, longer, thinner and with higher SVR for non-resprouters. The results were supported by the phylogenetic-informed analysis for the root traits most strongly related to soil resource acquisition (SRL, SVR and branching pattern). The seedling root structure of non-resprouters species allows them to more efficiently explore the upper soil layer, whereas seedling roots of resprouters will permit both carbon storage and deep soil penetration.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 264 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 3 1%
France 2 <1%
Argentina 2 <1%
Turkey 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Other 4 2%
Unknown 247 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 66 25%
Researcher 56 21%
Student > Master 40 15%
Student > Bachelor 17 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 6%
Other 34 13%
Unknown 36 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 129 49%
Environmental Science 74 28%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 7 3%
Chemistry 2 <1%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 <1%
Other 4 2%
Unknown 47 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 November 2013.
All research outputs
#5,668,455
of 22,653,392 outputs
Outputs from Oecologia
#1,169
of 4,201 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,088
of 99,247 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Oecologia
#10
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,653,392 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,201 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 99,247 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.