Title |
Identification of an intracellular metabolic signature impairing beta cell function in the rat beta cell line INS-1E and human islets
|
---|---|
Published in |
Diabetologia, July 2011
|
DOI | 10.1007/s00125-011-2249-7 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
I. Goehring, N. S. Sauter, G. Catchpole, A. Assmann, L. Shu, K. S. Zien, M. Moehlig, A. F. H. Pfeiffer, J. Oberholzer, L. Willmitzer, J. Spranger, K. Maedler |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 40 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 23% |
Researcher | 7 | 18% |
Student > Master | 5 | 13% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 5% |
Other | 2 | 5% |
Other | 7 | 18% |
Unknown | 8 | 20% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 28% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 10 | 25% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 5% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 3% |
Chemical Engineering | 1 | 3% |
Other | 2 | 5% |
Unknown | 13 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 April 2015.
All research outputs
#15,328,338
of 22,797,621 outputs
Outputs from Diabetologia
#4,451
of 5,035 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#84,899
of 119,735 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Diabetologia
#22
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,797,621 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,035 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.6. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 119,735 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.