↓ Skip to main content

Vegetation in Bangalore’s Slums: Composition, Species Distribution, Density, Diversity, and History

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Management, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
114 Mendeley
Title
Vegetation in Bangalore’s Slums: Composition, Species Distribution, Density, Diversity, and History
Published in
Environmental Management, April 2015
DOI 10.1007/s00267-015-0467-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Divya Gopal, Harini Nagendra, Michael Manthey

Abstract

There is widespread acknowledgement of the need for biodiversity and greening to be part of urban sustainability efforts. Yet we know little about greenery in the context of urban poverty, particularly in slums, which constitute a significant challenge for inclusive development in many rapidly growing cities. We assessed the composition, density, diversity, and species distribution of vegetation in 44 slums of Bangalore, India, comparing these to published studies on vegetation diversity in other land-use categories. Most trees were native to the region, as compared to other land-use categories such as parks and streets which are dominated by introduced species. Of the most frequently encountered tree species, Moringa oleifera and Cocos nucifera are important for food, while Ficus religiosa plays a critical cultural and religious role. Tree density and diversity were much lower in slums compared to richer residential neighborhoods. There are also differences in species preferences, with most plant (herb, shrub and vines) species in slums having economic, food, medicinal, or cultural use, while the species planted in richer residential areas are largely ornamental. Historic development has had an impact on species distribution, with older slums having larger sized tree species, while recent slums were dominated by smaller sized tree species with greater economic and food use. Extensive focus on planting trees and plant species with utility value is required in these congested neighborhoods, to provide livelihood support.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 114 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Indonesia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Estonia 1 <1%
Unknown 108 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 20%
Student > Master 16 14%
Researcher 13 11%
Student > Bachelor 10 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 8%
Other 22 19%
Unknown 21 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 27 24%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 24 21%
Social Sciences 9 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 4%
Engineering 5 4%
Other 18 16%
Unknown 26 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 December 2017.
All research outputs
#7,960,052
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Management
#667
of 1,914 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#88,712
of 279,100 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Management
#13
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,914 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,100 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.