↓ Skip to main content

The global impact of non-communicable diseases on macro-economic productivity: a systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Epidemiology, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
5 policy sources
twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
106 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
417 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
The global impact of non-communicable diseases on macro-economic productivity: a systematic review
Published in
European Journal of Epidemiology, April 2015
DOI 10.1007/s10654-015-0026-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Layal Chaker, Abby Falla, Sven J. van der Lee, Taulant Muka, David Imo, Loes Jaspers, Veronica Colpani, Shanthi Mendis, Rajiv Chowdhury, Wichor M. Bramer, Raha Pazoki, Oscar H. Franco

Abstract

Non-communicable diseases (NCDs) have large economic impact at multiple levels. To systematically review the literature investigating the economic impact of NCDs [including coronary heart disease (CHD), stroke, type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM), cancer (lung, colon, cervical and breast), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and chronic kidney disease (CKD)] on macro-economic productivity. Systematic search, up to November 6th 2014, of medical databases (Medline, Embase and Google Scholar) without language restrictions. To identify additional publications, we searched the reference lists of retrieved studies and contacted authors in the field. Randomized controlled trials, cohort, case-control, cross-sectional, ecological studies and modelling studies carried out in adults (>18 years old) were included. Two independent reviewers performed all abstract and full text selection. Disagreements were resolved through consensus or consulting a third reviewer. Two independent reviewers extracted data using a predesigned data collection form. Main outcome measure was the impact of the selected NCDs on productivity, measured in DALYs, productivity costs, and labor market participation, including unemployment, return to work and sick leave. From 4542 references, 126 studies met the inclusion criteria, many of which focused on the impact of more than one NCD on productivity. Breast cancer was the most common (n = 45), followed by stroke (n = 31), COPD (n = 24), colon cancer (n = 24), DM (n = 22), lung cancer (n = 16), CVD (n = 15), cervical cancer (n = 7) and CKD (n = 2). Four studies were from the WHO African Region, 52 from the European Region, 53 from the Region of the Americas and 16 from the Western Pacific Region, one from the Eastern Mediterranean Region and none from South East Asia. We found large regional differences in DALYs attributable to NCDs but especially for cervical and lung cancer. Productivity losses in the USA ranged from 88 million US dollars (USD) for COPD to 20.9 billion USD for colon cancer. CHD costs the Australian economy 13.2 billion USD per year. People with DM, COPD and survivors of breast and especially lung cancer are at a higher risk of reduced labor market participation. Overall NCDs generate a large impact on macro-economic productivity in most WHO regions irrespective of continent and income. The absolute global impact in terms of dollars and DALYs remains an elusive challenge due to the wide heterogeneity in the included studies as well as limited information from low- and middle-income countries.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 417 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Sri Lanka 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Unknown 411 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 66 16%
Researcher 55 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 53 13%
Student > Bachelor 38 9%
Lecturer 23 6%
Other 77 18%
Unknown 105 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 121 29%
Nursing and Health Professions 44 11%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 32 8%
Social Sciences 28 7%
Psychology 12 3%
Other 57 14%
Unknown 123 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 July 2021.
All research outputs
#1,975,813
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Epidemiology
#295
of 1,864 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,934
of 283,275 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Epidemiology
#7
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,864 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 283,275 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.