↓ Skip to main content

Genomic imprinting effects on complex traits in domesticated animal species

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Genetics, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (53rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
77 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Genomic imprinting effects on complex traits in domesticated animal species
Published in
Frontiers in Genetics, April 2015
DOI 10.3389/fgene.2015.00156
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alan M. O’Doherty, David E. MacHugh, Charles Spillane, David A. Magee

Abstract

Monoallelically expressed genes that exert their phenotypic effect in a parent-of-origin specific manner are considered to be subject to genomic imprinting, the most well understood form of epigenetic regulation of gene expression in mammals. The observed differences in allele specific gene expression for imprinted genes are not attributable to differences in DNA sequence information, but to specific chemical modifications of DNA and chromatin proteins. Since the discovery of genomic imprinting some three decades ago, over 100 imprinted mammalian genes have been identified and considerable advances have been made in uncovering the molecular mechanisms regulating imprinted gene expression. While most genomic imprinting studies have focused on mouse models and human biomedical disorders, recent work has highlighted the contributions of imprinted genes to complex trait variation in domestic livestock species. Consequently, greater understanding of genomic imprinting and its effect on agriculturally important traits is predicted to have major implications for the future of animal breeding and husbandry. In this review, we discuss genomic imprinting in mammals with particular emphasis on domestic livestock species and consider how this information can be used in animal breeding research and genetic improvement programs.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Hungary 1 1%
Colombia 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Argentina 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 72 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 16 21%
Researcher 14 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 18%
Student > Bachelor 4 5%
Professor 4 5%
Other 11 14%
Unknown 14 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 36 47%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 18%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 3 4%
Social Sciences 2 3%
Environmental Science 1 1%
Other 1 1%
Unknown 20 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 May 2015.
All research outputs
#13,233,234
of 23,321,213 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Genetics
#2,822
of 12,336 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#122,130
of 266,242 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Genetics
#70
of 118 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,321,213 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,336 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 266,242 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 118 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.