↓ Skip to main content

Whole body MRI in spondyloarthritis (SpA): Preliminary results suggest that DWI outperforms STIR for lesion detection

Overview of attention for article published in European Radiology, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
32 Mendeley
Title
Whole body MRI in spondyloarthritis (SpA): Preliminary results suggest that DWI outperforms STIR for lesion detection
Published in
European Radiology, April 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00330-018-5377-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Frederic E. Lecouvet, Nicolas Vander Maren, Laurence Collette, Nicolas Michoux, Perrine Triqueneaux, Maria Stoenoiu, Frederic Houssiau, Jacques Malghem, Marie-Laurence Denis, Ahmed Larbi, Adrien Nzeusseu Toukap

Abstract

To compare the diagnostic accuracy of DWI and STIR sequences in Whole body (WB) MRI of SpA patients. Twenty consecutive patients with confirmed active SpA and 20 controls were investigated with identical WB MRI protocols, including DWI and STIR images. Two observers recorded 'lesions' (high signal intensity foci on STIR and high b-value DWI) in 17 anatomical areas, making a 17-point 'area score' and a 40-point 'lesion score'. ROC performance, inter-observer agreement, correlation with clinical parameters and spine and sacro-iliac joints (SIJ) MRI scores were assessed. SpA patients had significantly higher lesion scores on DWI than on STIR (p<0.025). The lesion score area under the curve was significantly higher with DWI (99.9) than with STIR (95.8, p=0.02). DWI lesion score ≥5 had both sensitivity and specificity ≥85 %. With STIR the best threshold ≥3 yielded sensitivity ≥85 % and specificity ≥60 %. DWI area score ≥3 yielded sensitivity ≥85 % and specificity ≥80 %. With STIR the best threshold ≥4 yielded sensitivity ≥70 % and specificity ≥80 %. Inter-observer agreement was strong for both sequences. In patients, the lesion score was positively correlated with ASDAS-CRP, log(CRP), and local MRI scores. DWI is a promising alternative to STIR in WB MRI to detect active SpA lesions. • DWI is a robust alternative to STIR in WBMRI in SpA. • DWI might be superior in discriminating relevant inflammatory and degenerative changes. • Positive correlations exist between WB MRI, clinical, biological, local MRI data. • Distribution and frequency of abnormal MRI findings in SpA are highlighted.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 32 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 16%
Other 4 13%
Student > Master 4 13%
Student > Postgraduate 3 9%
Lecturer 2 6%
Other 4 13%
Unknown 10 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 44%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 13%
Mathematics 1 3%
Social Sciences 1 3%
Engineering 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 11 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 November 2020.
All research outputs
#6,070,151
of 23,045,021 outputs
Outputs from European Radiology
#837
of 4,177 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#105,615
of 327,033 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Radiology
#17
of 80 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,045,021 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,177 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,033 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 80 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.