You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Comparison of anthropometric measures as predictors of cancer incidence: A pooled collaborative analysis of 11 Australian cohorts
|
---|---|
Published in |
International Journal of Cancer, April 2015
|
DOI | 10.1002/ijc.29529 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Jessica L Harding, Jonathan E Shaw, Kaarin J Anstey, Robert Adams, Beverley Balkau, Sharon L Brennan-Olsen, Tom Briffa, Timothy M E Davis, Wendy A Davis, Annette Dobson, Leon Flicker, Graham Giles, Janet Grant, Rachel Huxley, Matthew Knuiman, Mary Luszcz, Robert J MacInnis, Paul Mitchell, Julie A Pasco, Christopher Reid, David Simmons, Leon Simons, Andrew Tonkin, Mark Woodward, Anna Peeters, Dianna J Magliano |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Australia | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 70 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 12 | 17% |
Researcher | 9 | 13% |
Professor | 7 | 10% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 9% |
Student > Master | 6 | 9% |
Other | 14 | 20% |
Unknown | 16 | 23% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 26 | 37% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 6% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 6% |
Computer Science | 2 | 3% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 3% |
Other | 11 | 16% |
Unknown | 21 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 June 2019.
All research outputs
#6,573,409
of 24,484,013 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Cancer
#4,180
of 12,084 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#72,455
of 269,201 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Cancer
#27
of 83 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,484,013 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,084 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 269,201 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 83 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.