↓ Skip to main content

Pain Control

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 9: Plasticity of inhibition in the spinal cord.
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Plasticity of inhibition in the spinal cord.
Chapter number 9
Book title
Pain Control
Published in
Handbook of experimental pharmacology, January 2015
DOI 10.1007/978-3-662-46450-2_9
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-66-246449-6, 978-3-66-246450-2
Authors

Todd, Andrew J, Andrew J. Todd, Todd, Andrew J.

Abstract

Inhibitory interneurons, which use GABA and/or glycine as their principal transmitter, have numerous roles in regulating the transmission of sensory information through the spinal dorsal horn. These roles are likely to be performed by different populations of interneurons, each with specific locations in the synaptic circuitry of the region. Peripheral nerve injury frequently leads to neuropathic pain, and it is thought that loss of function of inhibitory interneurons in the dorsal horn contributes to this condition. Several mechanisms have been proposed for this disinhibition, including death of inhibitory interneurons, decreased transmitter release, diminished activity of these cells and reduced effectiveness of GABA and glycine as inhibitory transmitters. However, despite numerous studies on this important topic, it is still not clear which (if any) of these mechanisms contributes to neuropathic pain after nerve injury.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 2%
Unknown 41 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 21%
Student > Master 9 21%
Researcher 5 12%
Student > Postgraduate 3 7%
Professor 2 5%
Other 9 21%
Unknown 5 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 14 33%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 17%
Psychology 1 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 8 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 April 2015.
All research outputs
#15,328,338
of 22,797,621 outputs
Outputs from Handbook of experimental pharmacology
#394
of 647 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#208,934
of 353,063 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Handbook of experimental pharmacology
#42
of 65 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,797,621 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 647 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,063 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 65 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.