You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Evaluation of a newly identified soluble CD14 subtype as a marker for sepsis
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Infection & Chemotherapy, January 2005
|
DOI | 10.1007/s10156-005-0400-4 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Yasunori Yaegashi, Nobuhiro Sato, Yasushi Suzuki, Masahiro Kojika, Satoko Imai, Gaku Takahashi, Michiko Miyata, Shigeatsu Endo, Kamon Shirakawa, Shoji Furusako |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 155 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Egypt | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 154 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 13% |
Researcher | 16 | 10% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 13 | 8% |
Student > Postgraduate | 12 | 8% |
Student > Master | 12 | 8% |
Other | 37 | 24% |
Unknown | 45 | 29% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 63 | 41% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 8% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 10 | 6% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 6 | 4% |
Chemistry | 4 | 3% |
Other | 14 | 9% |
Unknown | 46 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 June 2023.
All research outputs
#1,654,153
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Infection & Chemotherapy
#60
of 1,595 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,613
of 151,221 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Infection & Chemotherapy
#1
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,595 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 151,221 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.