You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Mutations in BRIP1 confer high risk of ovarian cancer
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Genetics, October 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1038/ng.955 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Thorunn Rafnar, Daniel F Gudbjartsson, Patrick Sulem, Aslaug Jonasdottir, Asgeir Sigurdsson, Adalbjorg Jonasdottir, Soren Besenbacher, Pär Lundin, Simon N Stacey, Julius Gudmundsson, Olafur T Magnusson, Louise le Roux, Gudbjorg Orlygsdottir, Hafdis T Helgadottir, Hrefna Johannsdottir, Arnaldur Gylfason, Laufey Tryggvadottir, Jon G Jonasson, Ana de Juan, Eugenia Ortega, Jose M Ramon-Cajal, Maria D García-Prats, Carlos Mayordomo, Angeles Panadero, Fernando Rivera, Katja K H Aben, Anne M van Altena, Leon F A G Massuger, Mervi Aavikko, Paula M Kujala, Synnöve Staff, Lauri A Aaltonen, Kristrun Olafsdottir, Johannes Bjornsson, Augustine Kong, Anna Salvarsdottir, Hafsteinn Saemundsson, Karl Olafsson, Kristrun R Benediktsdottir, Jeffrey Gulcher, Gisli Masson, Lambertus A Kiemeney, Jose I Mayordomo, Unnur Thorsteinsdottir, Kari Stefansson |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 311 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | <1% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Peru | 1 | <1% |
| Iceland | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 296 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 72 | 23% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 56 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 34 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 25 | 8% |
| Other | 24 | 8% |
| Other | 46 | 15% |
| Unknown | 54 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 93 | 30% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 67 | 22% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 60 | 19% |
| Computer Science | 4 | 1% |
| Neuroscience | 4 | 1% |
| Other | 17 | 5% |
| Unknown | 66 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 March 2023.
All research outputs
#1,941,341
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Nature Genetics
#2,661
of 7,655 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,306
of 148,423 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Genetics
#21
of 82 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,655 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 43.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 148,423 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 82 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.