↓ Skip to main content

On Clenshaws's method and a generalisation to faber series

Overview of attention for article published in Numerische Mathematik, September 1987
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#37 of 288)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
Title
On Clenshaws's method and a generalisation to faber series
Published in
Numerische Mathematik, September 1987
DOI 10.1007/bf01400888
Authors

S. W. Ellacott, E. B. Saff

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 1 50%
Student > Master 1 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 2 100%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 April 2015.
All research outputs
#5,876,831
of 22,799,071 outputs
Outputs from Numerische Mathematik
#37
of 288 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,114
of 11,960 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Numerische Mathematik
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,799,071 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 288 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 11,960 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them