You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Assessing the quality of feedback in the peer-review process
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Higher Education Research and Development, April 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1080/07294360.2015.1011086 |
| Authors |
A.R. Dobele |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 1 | 13% |
| Sweden | 1 | 13% |
| France | 1 | 13% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 4 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 63% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 25% |
| Scientists | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | 2% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 44 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 11% |
| Lecturer | 4 | 9% |
| Other | 14 | 30% |
| Unknown | 7 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 13 | 28% |
| Computer Science | 5 | 11% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 4 | 9% |
| Linguistics | 4 | 9% |
| Arts and Humanities | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 10 | 22% |
| Unknown | 7 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 January 2022.
All research outputs
#4,760,313
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Higher Education Research and Development
#465
of 1,382 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,902
of 279,170 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Higher Education Research and Development
#5
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,382 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,170 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.