↓ Skip to main content

Genetic basis of alpha‐aminoadipic and alpha‐ketoadipic aciduria

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Inherited Metabolic Disease, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
peer_reviews
1 peer review site
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
52 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
46 Mendeley
Title
Genetic basis of alpha‐aminoadipic and alpha‐ketoadipic aciduria
Published in
Journal of Inherited Metabolic Disease, April 2015
DOI 10.1007/s10545-015-9841-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jacob Hagen, Heleen te Brinke, Ronald J. A. Wanders, Alida C. Knegt, Esmee Oussoren, A. Jeannette M. Hoogeboom, George J. G. Ruijter, Daniel Becker, Karl Otfried Schwab, Ingo Franke, Marinus Duran, Hans R. Waterham, Jörn Oliver Sass, Sander M. Houten

Abstract

Alpha-aminoadipic and alpha-ketoadipic aciduria is an autosomal recessive inborn error of lysine, hydroxylysine, and tryptophan degradation. To date, DHTKD1 mutations have been reported in two alpha-aminoadipic and alpha-ketoadipic aciduria patients. We have now sequenced DHTKD1 in nine patients diagnosed with alpha-aminoadipic and alpha-ketoadipic aciduria as well as one patient with isolated alpha-aminoadipic aciduria, and identified causal mutations in eight. We report nine novel mutations, including three missense mutations, two nonsense mutations, two splice donor mutations, one duplication, and one deletion and insertion. Two missense mutations, one of which was reported before, were observed in the majority of cases. The clinical presentation of this group of patients was inhomogeneous. Our results confirm that alpha-aminoadipic and alpha-ketoadipic aciduria is caused by mutations in DHTKD1, and further establish that DHTKD1 encodes the E1 subunit of the alpha-ketoadipic acid dehydrogenase complex.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 46 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 28%
Student > Bachelor 6 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 11%
Student > Master 5 11%
Professor 3 7%
Other 11 24%
Unknown 3 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 22%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 15%
Chemistry 5 11%
Neuroscience 3 7%
Other 5 11%
Unknown 5 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 April 2023.
All research outputs
#5,647,385
of 22,799,071 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Inherited Metabolic Disease
#433
of 1,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#66,030
of 264,200 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Inherited Metabolic Disease
#7
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,799,071 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,842 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,200 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.