| Title |
Desmoplastic Melanoma: A Pathologically and Clinically Distinct Form of Cutaneous Melanoma
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of Surgical Oncology, March 2005
|
| DOI | 10.1245/aso.2005.03.022 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
William G. Hawkins, Klaus J. Busam, Leah Ben-Porat, Katherine S. Panageas, Daniel G. Coit, David E. Gyorki, David C. Linehan, Mary S. Brady |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Ukraine | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 34 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 17% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 17% |
| Researcher | 5 | 14% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Professor | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 5 | 14% |
| Unknown | 9 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 20 | 57% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 6% |
| Chemical Engineering | 1 | 3% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 3% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 9 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 April 2015.
All research outputs
#3,324,780
of 24,927,532 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#923
of 7,072 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,270
of 73,478 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#1
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,927,532 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,072 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 73,478 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them