↓ Skip to main content

Context-dependent similarity effects in letter recognition

Overview of attention for article published in Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
Title
Context-dependent similarity effects in letter recognition
Published in
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, April 2015
DOI 10.3758/s13423-015-0826-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sachiko Kinoshita, Serje Robidoux, Daniel Guilbert, Dennis Norris

Abstract

In visual word recognition tasks, digit primes that are visually similar to letter string targets (e.g., 4/A, 8/B) are known to facilitate letter identification relative to visually dissimilar digits (e.g., 6/A, 7/B); in contrast, with letter primes, visual similarity effects have been elusive. In the present study we show that the visual similarity effect with letter primes can be made to come and go, depending on whether it is necessary to discriminate between visually similar letters. The results support a Bayesian view which regards letter recognition not as a passive activation process driven by the fixed stimulus properties, but as a dynamic evidence accumulation process for a decision that is guided by the task context.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 22 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 23%
Student > Bachelor 3 14%
Student > Master 2 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 9%
Other 3 14%
Unknown 5 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 7 32%
Linguistics 4 18%
Arts and Humanities 1 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 5%
Other 2 9%
Unknown 6 27%