↓ Skip to main content

Semaglutide Added to Basal Insulin in Type 2 Diabetes (SUSTAIN 5): A Randomized, Controlled Trial

Overview of attention for article published in JCEM, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
39 X users
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
250 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
266 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Semaglutide Added to Basal Insulin in Type 2 Diabetes (SUSTAIN 5): A Randomized, Controlled Trial
Published in
JCEM, April 2018
DOI 10.1210/jc.2018-00070
Pubmed ID
Authors

Helena W Rodbard, Ildiko Lingvay, John Reed, Raymond de la Rosa, Ludger Rose, Danny Sugimoto, Eiichi Araki, Pei-Ling Chu, Nelun Wijayasinghe, Paul Norwood

Abstract

Combination therapy with insulin and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) is increasingly important for treating type 2 diabetes (T2D). This trial assesses the efficacy and safety of semaglutide, a GLP-1RA, as an add-on to basal insulin. To demonstrate the superiority of semaglutide versus placebo on glycaemic control as add-on to basal insulin in patients with T2D. Phase 3a, double blind, placebo-controlled, 30-week trial. 90 sites in five countries. 397 patients with uncontrolled T2D receiving stable therapy with basal insulin ± metformin. Subcutaneous semaglutide 0.5 or 1.0 mg once weekly, or volume-matched placebo. Primary endpoint was change in glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) from baseline to Week 30. Confirmatory secondary endpoint was change in body weight from baseline to Week 30. At Week 30, mean HbA1c reductions (mean baseline value 8.4% [67.9 mmol/mol]) with semaglutide 0.5 and 1.0 mg were 1.4% (15.8 mmol/mol) and 1.8% (20.2 mmol/mol), versus 0.1% (1.0 mmol/mol) with placebo (estimated treatment difference [ETD] [95% confidence interval (CI)] versus placebo -1.35 (14.8 mmol/mol), [-1.61; -1.10] and -1.75% (19.2 mmol/mol), [-2.01; -1.50]; both p<0.0001). Severe or blood glucose-confirmed hypoglycaemic episodes were reported in 11 patients (17 events) and 14 (25 events) patients with semaglutide 0.5 mg and 1.0 mg, respectively, versus 7 patients (13 events) with placebo (estimated rate ratios versus placebo [95% CI], 2.08 [0.67; 6.51] and 2.41 [0.84; 6.96] for 0.5 and 1.0 mg; both p=nonsignificant). Mean body weight decreased with semaglutide 0.5 and 1.0 mg, versus placebo from baseline to end-of-treatment: 3.7, 6.4 and 1.4 kg (ETD [95% CI], -2.31 [-3.33; -1.29], and -5.06 [-6.08; -4.04] kg; both p<0.0001). Premature treatment discontinuation due to adverse events were higher for semaglutide 0.5 and 1.0 mg versus placebo (4.5, 6.1 and 0.8%), mainly due to gastrointestinal disorders. Semaglutide, added to basal insulin, significantly reduced HbA1c and body weight in patients with uncontrolled T2D versus placebo.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 39 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 266 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 266 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 31 12%
Student > Master 27 10%
Other 24 9%
Researcher 23 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 7%
Other 46 17%
Unknown 96 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 85 32%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 18 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 2%
Other 21 8%
Unknown 108 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 45. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 February 2024.
All research outputs
#927,998
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from JCEM
#723
of 15,435 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,515
of 340,059 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JCEM
#13
of 111 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,435 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 340,059 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 111 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.