↓ Skip to main content

Testing competing models of the temperature hiatus: assessing the effects of conditioning variables and temporal uncertainties through sample-wide break detection

Overview of attention for article published in Climatic Change, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
10 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
36 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Testing competing models of the temperature hiatus: assessing the effects of conditioning variables and temporal uncertainties through sample-wide break detection
Published in
Climatic Change, April 2015
DOI 10.1007/s10584-015-1391-5
Authors

Felix Pretis, Michael L. Mann, Robert K. Kaufmann

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Estonia 1 5%
Switzerland 1 5%
Unknown 18 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 30%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 15%
Professor 3 15%
Student > Master 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 2 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 4 20%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 4 20%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 4 20%
Computer Science 2 10%
Mathematics 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 4 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 August 2018.
All research outputs
#2,533,175
of 25,399,318 outputs
Outputs from Climatic Change
#1,753
of 6,043 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,645
of 279,370 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Climatic Change
#13
of 73 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,399,318 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,043 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,370 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 73 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.